In the News
African Court sessions for 2013
04 - 15 March 2013, Arusha, Tanzania.
Democratic Party Petitions the East Africa Court of Justice
The Democratic Party a Ugandan political party has petitioned the East African Court of Justice (EACJ). It is a matter against the Attorney Generals of Uganda, Kenya, Burundi, Rwanda and the Secretary General to the Community that seeks to enforce the Depositing of a Declaration giving a direct access to Court by individuals and NGOs with observer status before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights to petition the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights, as provided by Article 34 (6) of the Protocol to the Charter Establishing that Court. (Case Ref No. 2 of 2012).
The petitioner essentially argues that the acts of the respondents of failure or refusal and or delay to make respect declarations to accept competence of the African Court is an infringement of Articles 5, 6, 7(2), 8(1)C, 126 and 130 of the Treaty Establishing the East African Community and Articles 1,2,7,13,26,62,63,65 and 66 of the African Charter.
The first scheduling conference between both parties was held on 1st February 2013 at the EACJ in Arusha, Tanzania.
DITSHWANELO receives human rights award
One of the Coalition's member organisations, The Botswana Centre for Human Rights (DITSHWANELO), was honored on Monday 10 December 2012 with the Human Rights Prize 2012 of the Commission Nationale Consultative des Droits de l’Homme (CNCDH) of the French Republic. Access the full article here
African Court asked to rule on legality of SADC Tribunal's suspension
Johannesburg, 26 November 2012 - In a landmark legal request, the African Court on Human and People’s Rights has been asked to use its advisory powers to determine whether the suspension of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal by the region’s leaders was legal or not.
The request for an advisory opinion was lodged by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) and the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) at the Court in the Tanzanian city of Arusha on Friday, 23 November.
PALU and SALC maintain that the decisions taken by SADC Heads of State and Government to suspend the SADC Tribunal were unlawful since they violate judicial independence, access to justice, the right to effective remedies and the rule of law.
“A positive ruling from the African Court is one of the last remaining avenues to securing a revival of the SADC Tribunal and preserving the rule of law in southern Africa,” said Nicole Fritz, Executive Director of SALC. “Without the Tribunal, most of the region’s inhabitants – who cannot access credible domestic courts – have no real prospect of securing justice and redress.”
If the Court rules that the suspension was illegal, it will be a definitive legal determination of the lawfulness of the SADC Summit’s actions – a ruling that SADC will find difficult to ignore given that it is required to coordinate its policies and programmes with those of the African Union (AU).
“The Courts of the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), such as the SADC Tribunal, are crucial in guaranteeing cross-border and inter-regional business and trade investment, and just rule of law in which the rights of individuals, businesses, groups and Member States are equally protected,” said Don Deya, Chief Executive Officer of PALU. “Our request for an advisory opinion is part of an initiative by African civil society to realise independent, empowered, effective and efficient REC Courts all over the continent.”
In their request for an advisory opinion, PALU and SALC have asked the African Court to determine whether:
The request for an advisory opinion has been supported by a number of other prominent regional civil society organisations, including the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and the SADC Lawyers Association (SADC LA).
“Regional civil society has waged a tireless advocacy campaign to save the SADC Tribunal but despite our best efforts to engage with member states and highlight their legal obligations, SADC leaders persisted in dismantling the Tribunal,” said Arnold Tsunga, Executive Director of the ICJ Africa Programme. “The African Court provides another chance to convince them to change their policies and resurrect the Tribunal for the good of all southern Africans.”
It is a view echoed by Kondwa Sakala Chibiya, President of the SADC LA. “Obviously we would have preferred SADC to have resolved this issue on its own and for us not to have been forced to approach the African Court,” she said. “But after SADC ignored the recommendations of the legal advisors it had appointed and its own ministers of justice and attorneys general, there was no other option.”
The SADC Tribunal has been defunct for more than two years after SADC leaders demanded a review of its powers and functions, following a series of cases in which it had ruled against the Zimbabwean government.
Despite a campaign spearheaded by legal bodies, civil society organisations and individuals such as Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, SADC’s leaders decided not to the revive the original Tribunal at their Summit in August 2012.
Instead, they opted to destroy it, resolving that a protocol for a new Tribunal would be negotiated and that the new Tribunal’s mandate would be limited only to adjudication of member states’ disputes. The new Tribunal – shorn of a human rights mandate and with all access by individuals, companies or organisations denied – will be little more than a shell.
For further information contact:
- Dlamini-Zuma new AU Commission chairperson
- New African Court judges elected
- Sensitisation Seminar on African Court - Johannesburg 2011
- Sensitisation Seminar on African Court - Kampala 2011
- Ghana made declaration allowing for direct access to the African Court
- Third meeting of the African Court and the African Commission
- Executive Committee met African Court judges
- Developments at the 47th session of the African Commission
- Ratification status of the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights
- Direct individual access to the African Court